Some Histories of Gaming: Case Study in the History of Mobile Gaming: Canabalt
One of the questions Jessica Hammer is often asked is how games have changed with the advent of digital technologies. According to Hammer, games have been shaped by the technologies people had on hand for as long as people have played them.
“For example, if you look at the manufacturing of game pieces, of dice, of cards, of Meeples, of the things that we can make and that have a cultural understanding of how they work – these shape the kinds of play we can do with them.”
Hammer often connects games across the digital and non-digital divide. To her, there is no divide.
“The way I analyze games is looking at the sort of verbs or actions that they encourage players to take. So you’ve got matching games that are happening in the physical world. For example, if you think about Set, it’s a game of visual perception. You’re looking at a set of cards. You’re looking for matches.
“But that connects to games like match-three games, like Bejeweled or Candy Crush, where you’re looking for matches in a digital environment. Those underlying principles of what the player is doing and the kind of perceptual tasks that are being asked of them are the same.”
However, technologies still have new angles to offer. They provide new human-computer interactions, affordances, or new capabilities for interaction. One way they do this is by automating the complex equations that can make physical games difficult to play at an enjoyable pace.
“Most people who play board games have had the experience of sitting around and waiting while someone else is counting up points,” explains Hammer. “A computer can do that for you, what we call, automagically.”
Computers are also great at hiding key information in games that call for it like Hanabi, one of Hammer’s favorite games.
“These are new capacities that computer games give us,” says Hammer. “We can use them to enhance the kinds of core human interactions that games are.”